This blog is a random collection of information, partly in support of my quotations web site. Other topics include wine, military news, economics, history, libertarianism, and other random things which happen to strike my fancy. Backup site is at http://quotulatiousness.blogspot.com/ (if there are no posts showing, hit the backup blog for explanation). Comments have been turned off, as the spam was getting too much to handle. Comments can be emailed to me for posting.

January 18, 2006

Predictions are for geeks

A post up at Let it bleed talks about the difficulty of predicting seat totals from the percentages reported in the polls. The predictions at this stage of the last election were pretty far off:

Continuing on in my new-found role of playing the grump, I was mentioning to a friend the other day that people seem to have forgotten what actually happened in the 2004 election. In hindsight (note the emphasis) the results have acquired a cast of inevitability — the media coverage was too negative! Harper stopped campaigning with a week to go! the Liberal attack ads were brilliant! the polls indicated the Tories would lose!

Only in the last couple of days have the Tories come close to majority territory. On the latest poll data, using my up-to-the-second, hi-tech, Excel spreadsheet (anyone who knows my Excel skilz will be laughing at this point), I confidently predict 76 Crooks, 138 Fascists, 48 Commies, and 46 Traitors. Resulting in a minority Fascist government, ready to negotiate with the Commies or the Traitors for support.

My numbers are at least as believable as any others, but I don't believe 'em myself, partly because they don't account for the "wasted" votes in ridings where the winner garners a huge plurality (Alberta and Quebec, mostly) and partly because I still don't really trust the polling numbers to be accurate.

Posted by Nicholas at January 18, 2006 05:16 PM
Comments
You are begging for a pool of your own - aren't you! Admit it! PS: did you forget one seat for the Utter Fools or do the Utter Fools not earn it? Posted by: Alan at January 18, 2006 07:28 PM
The numbers don't quite add up for an Utter Fool to break into Parliament. But as I said in the main posting, these are not particularly rigorous number-crunching exercises . . . and I'm one of the last people you'd want doing any such number-crunching anyway! Posted by: Nicholas at January 18, 2006 11:48 PM
How would you like a Fascist-Commie minority government? I was just thnking about it today and it seems like something that would be right up your alley. Posted by: Liam at January 19, 2006 12:39 PM
So Liam... you want the Liberals to win, do you? Posted by: Jon at January 19, 2006 01:02 PM
Unless the Fascists get a boost in their numbers over the weekend, my model still predicts a minority. They could team up with the Traitors or the Commies, but I don't see them co-operating with the Crooks. I just want to have the Crooks out of power for at least long enough to have some serious investigation into all the fun and games over the Sponsorship funds (and to close down the $2Bn gun registry). Posted by: Nicholas at January 19, 2006 01:27 PM
I don't want the Liberals back either. I'd be happy under Commie rule. Posted by: Liam at January 20, 2006 05:02 PM


Visitors since 17 August, 2004